Wednesday, May 9, 2018

The First Date tag

Hi there,
How’s it going? 
First of all, thank you so much to all of you who have been visiting me throughout this last two weeks, the stats are like crazy since I posted my ARC review, so, an immense hug to each and every single one of you who commented, read, or even just clicked them. It means the world to me, that someone takes time out of their day to read something that I wrote.

Today I’d like to share a book tag, that was popular on Youtube, among booktubers: The First Date Book tag.
I know it is old, it’s a 2017 tag, it was done long before I discovered booktubing, but as I have an answer for every part of it, I’d thought it would be fun to try. I was inspired by LilyCReads, who did the tag here, and also by Katesbookdate, the creator of the tag herself, here. Make sure you visit both of them, their channels are just AMAZING.

I have reviews for the books I will mention, where I explain myself better, so if you want to take a look, check the right column, in the Blog Archive and Popular Posts, ok?

Let’s go:

1. The awkward first date, a book where something felt off, it wasn’t necessarily a bad book but it lacked that spark for you.

This is definitely The Dancing Master, by Julie Klassen.
 
The whole theme of this book sounded wonderful, and beautiful, as there was dancing involved, and it is one of the things I love the most in historical fiction and romance, but it felt flat, there was some really lacking elements to the plot that I just couldn’t swallow. Although Julie Klassen is still one of my favourite authors, and all of her books are great. Read her books, now!









2. The cheap first date, a book that turned out to be less than you expected.

I’m going with Arabella, by Georgette Heyer. 
I had seen so much praise around the author, calling her the Queen of Regency romance, and when I read this one… No. Not great, but not good either. The characters are little two-dimensional, they don’t have so much interaction for me to believe their love… No, it just didn’t do it for me.










3. The well prepared first date, a book that turned out to be better than expected.
With is one, I’m gonna pick not one, but two books. 

The first one, Divergent, by Veronica Roth. 

This is one of those books that, apparently, you either love it, or hate it. I can’t say that I loved it, but it did surprise me, on the whole Dystopian worldbuilding –the society that is dominated, but considers it the right thing–, and a heroine that is the furthest from the damsel in distress, who knows how to punch back and fight like hell, and doesn’t let the love interest to rule her life or her decisions. Definitely good. Not perfect, but a must-read for Dystopia lovers.







And the other would be Threats of Sky and Sea, by Jennifer Ellision. 

It wasn’t perfect, but it was definitely better than I was expecting, with a both strong and funny heroine, a wonderful setting, and a simply great cast of characters. If you love fantasy, you should definitely read this one.












4. The hot but dumb first date, the book that was pretty but not to so hot on the inside.
I know this immediately.
Damn you, beautiful cover I grabbed it because of the promise of a fantasy world based on India, a good, refreshing change of the usual Europe-inspired fantasy setting. But the abundance of clichés, the dumb heroine, the stupid insta-love, and the poor worldbuilding just didn’t do it for me. Sorry.











5. The blind date, a book you picked up not knowing anything about it.

I rarely know nothing about my next read. But I have one.

This is the second book in the Earthsea Cycle. I had a very vague idea about the first one, but I knew absolutely nothing about the rest, and it was one of the best surprises I’ve ever encountered in the literary world. Every fantasy lover out there simply HAS to read the Earthsea Cycle. Go. Now. *snapping fingers in your face*







6. Speed dating, a book that you read super fast.

This is easy. 
Jane Austen one of my favourite authors. It is a really short epistolary novel, the first Jane Austen ever wrote, when she was very young, and you already could tell she would be a genius. It’s a glimpse of the amazing, smart, observing woman that would be known as one of the best authors the world has ever seen. A must read.










7. The rebound, a book you’ve read too soon after a book hangover.
Even though I don’t relate with the book hangover term, I have an answer.


I read it because I just wanted more of this world. I didn’t want to say goodbye to Percy and Annabeth, and I didn’t want to leave Camp-Half Blood and abandon the quests to save the world. And it was great, just… not as good as the previous saga. A four GoodReads stars for me. The Mark of Athena and The House of Hades are both perfect, though. A must-read.






8. The overly enthusiastic date, the book that was trying to hard.
Oh, my God.
This book is great in terms of worldbuilding, and I was loving every minute of it, but in one, single sentence (literally), the whole thing fell down like a dynamited building. Relationships between the characters that came out of nowhere, a constantly whining heroine, contradictory attitudes in the main characters, and an ending that made me want to flush the book down the toilet. One of the worst fantasy books I’ve ever read. Just, no.








9. The perfect first date, a book that did everything right for you.
Let’s go with an obvious one.


Harry Potter, by J. K. Rowling, the true Queen of Magic. This is perfection, and it doesn't need further explaining.







But also this one: Percy Jackson and the Olympians, by Rick Riordan.


Oh, it was so addictive, and wonderful!! The characters are just lovable, and the villains, astounding. I read the whole saga in like a month, I devoured it, and loved every single book. All of them, perfect. A must-read, I don’t care this is a Middle Grade, just read it. Read it. Now.

I love all of them, but if I have to pick one, that would be The Battle of the Labyrinth. It was EPIC.





10. The embarrassing first date, a book that you are embarrassed to admit that you’ve liked, or a book that you are embarrassed to be reading in public

I’m gonna pick the reading in public part. And you all know the answer to this one.


Do I need to explain myself? Of course not. I would never want to be seen reading this in public.











Hope you enjoyed that, I’m not going to tag anyone because this is really old, and I don’t know if it is a thing anymore (probably not), and if you want to do the tag, go ahead! Just let me know, so I can see it!

Thanks for reading!
‘til next time!

Monday, May 7, 2018

Review - Beyond All Dreams

Original Title: Beyond All Dreams
Series: -
Author: Elizabeth Camden
Published: December 15th, 2014

Publisher: Bethany House Publishers
*THE FOLLOWING REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS*

This is one of those books I don’t know very well why I decided to read. For some reason the cover was stuck in my head, so I had to go for it. It is my first book by Elizabeth Camden, and I have to say, it wasn’t so good. Don’t get me wrong, though, I will give the author another try, I’ve heard wonders about her other books, and the covers are pretty much some of the most beautiful I’ve ever seen. But this one, in particular… No. I’m not going to destroy it with my review, I promise, but neither I will be overly generous. I can’t say that I liked it.

First of all, an obvious point. As the setting of the novel suggests, this story is going to mean so much more to you if you are American, which is not my case. However, I looked up some pictures of the modern Library of Congress in Washington, and it is a fascinating place, from every possible point of view. I admit that at one point I felt a little jealous of Anna for working in such a beautiful place, a true palace, every single day of her life. No wonder she loved her job.

The first thing I noticed as I read this book is the narration. It feels kind of one dimensional, very simple and straightforward. As for the characters, I liked them, but I can’t say I loved them. Their backstories are told as soon as they are introduced, like Anna’s, or her friend’s, Neville Bernhard. And I’m not a fan of knowing every detail right from the get-go, because as the story progresses, I’m surely going to forget things. I’d rather discover things along the way. Plus, for example, after reading about Luke’s past, I felt like all the suffering he went through didn’t seem to belong to the same man whose story I was reading, so brutally honest and frank as he was. Both he and Anna have deep backstories, difficult pasts, but I liked to see them power through them, their main motivation being to prevent it from repeating itself, clearing mistakes, and trying to make peace with all the wrongdoings they suffered.

I liked Anna O’Brien. She’s passionate about her job, she loves books and knowledge, and truly devotes herself to both of them. We could have been friends. She’s also very determined, and ready to make her life count, even with all the the difficult situations she lived as a kid, without her parents, and suffering her aunt and uncle’s abuse. I liked that she didn’t give up on the ship’s true story, until she found out the truth, even with the threats from the Navy over her. She didn’t let her past define her, and I liked that. But I wish she had shown that very same passion and determination in her relationship with Luke, and also, I would have loved to see her finally writing her so desired biography about her father’s cartographic contributions, instead of leaving the idea out of the ending’s wrap up. As Luke encouraged her so much to do it, and had so much influence on her, it would have been nice to see her working on it.

Right from the first chapter you know which the main plot will be: the Culpeper’s disappearance, and Anna’s obsession to correct the final report that says that the ship sank during a hurricane in the Caribbean, based on some letters she has from her father, who supposedly died in that shipwreck. That whole plot is ok, but it is introduced so fast that feels like a slap in the face. After that, the novel drags at times, it gets slow, and at one point I was just begging for something to happen instead of so much speculation and theories around the ship. Sometimes, so much past prevents the present from unfolding. These characters are stuck in the past. 

Talking about the past, I have to mention Luke Callahan. I liked him, but to a certain extent. He has this strong personality and temper, and has lived a difficult life. But the problems that have plagued his family since forever, like drinking and violence, take so much time and space! He constantly worries about them, and is scared his nephew could go down the same path his father, brother and sister went… It’s fine, it makes him very human, but at some point it needs to stop. The whole thing is all over the place, and at one point I found myself thinking “Ok, I get it, your family has a drinking problem. Let’s move on.” I couldn’t care in the least about his rivalry with Speaker Jones, that part simply did not hold my interest at all. Plus, there’s some things about him that make me wonder why Anna likes him in the first place. He’s has a temper, he’s is quick for anger, and is very intense and passionate. But he’s also very controlling, and invasive; he helps Anna to figure out what happened to the ship, until he finds out a truth he can’t possibly reveal and deliberately breaks into her room, and steals her father’s letters, when he had previously said he loved her and wanted her to fall in love with him. And, if I were Anna, that wouldn’t help at all to that purpose. It doesn’t sound like someone who claims to love you, and wants to marry you, would do.

And so we get to the love story. Honestly, I didn’t like it. It had potential, but when the insta-love showed up, I just couldn’t deal with it. He literally likes her from the first moment he sees her, when he addressees her disrespectfully, and Anna responds him curtly, but smartly. And she obviously starts liking him back, if not right there, shortly after their first encounter, as he starts frequenting the library, and working with her in the map room. I couldn’t understand how Anna, after being abused by a violent man as a child (her uncle), fell for a man who’s often verbally violent, a control-freak, and is not beyond using methods like breaking in into her bedroom to steal from her, or grabbing her and pulling her with him every time he’s being passionate or angry about something. 

On the other hand, I believe the author relies too much in telling, where she shouldn’t. Look at this:

Luke has a past love, her name was Violet Desjardins, and by the time he falls for Anna, at one point it says: “He didn’t want to think about Violet. He wanted Anna”.

Two pages earlier, this happens: “The attraction she felt for him was growing, like a sponge expanding in water, and this sort of fascination was dangerous”. This is Anna, and obviously, she stops herself immediately when she thinks of him.

*sigh*

This frustrated me. All I could think was “No. You DON’T say they feel attracted to each other. You just don’t”. I shouldn’t need to be told this. I should be able to see it, through their dialogue and actions, I should see their growing feelings and their chemistry, instead of being told about their attraction, because it will do nothing more than making their love less believable. It feels like they will fall in love just because the author said so. I personally think that this book could have been so much better if the author had decided to show their love instead of telling about it, so we can actually feel those intense emotions she claims Anna and Luke are experiencing.

Luke’s declaration to Anna happens way too soon, and their first kiss is probably one of the least romantic first kisses I’ve ever read, because he just does it, without even being gentle with the woman he wants to make fall in love with him. He proves himself sweet and in love later, but until then I just couldn’t really like him. But what happened at the end had me rolling my eyes. After the story about the Culpeper appears on the newspapers, Luke storms into the boardinghouse where Anna lives, as she and the other women are dining, and yells at her in front of everyone, red with anger, accusing her of selling the story he had made her swear she would never reveal. He had no proof she had done it. None at all. But I think that if you supposedly love a person, as he claims to love Anna, you wouldn’t do this. You wouldn’t humiliate her in front of everyone, and even less without any solid proof that she’s actually guilty. And what bothers me the most is that, one or two pages later, when they talk and she tells him she didn’t do it, it says:

Maybe Luke couldn’t solve peace between the nations, but he had tamed the wildness inside him. Trying to pretend his stormy passion did not exist would be hopeless and a waste of one of his greatest strengths. But he could tame it and turn it toward worthy goals.

Seriously? Are you kidding me? Literally, two seconds earlier he came and made a scene in front of everyone, without even knowing the whole story –just because he thought–, and not even doing the basic thing a gentleman would do before snapping like that, like, I don’t know, discretely taking her outside for a private conversation, perhaps? And that, my friends, is how he trusts the woman he claims to love. Don’t try to tell me he dominated his temper, because he clearly didn't. 

Apart from Luke and Anna, the rest of characters feel like background noise. Luke’s sister and nephew do give him a motivation, something to live for, but the rest…? I mean, look at Neville Bernhard. He’s Anna’s lifelong best friend, and everyone thinks they will eventually get married. But after some strange behavior, he reveals that he’s in love, and will marry his landlady, a Mrs. Norquist. And I think, what kind of surprise can it be if he, one of the main characters, ends up marrying a woman who never appears in the whole story? What it is supposed to make me feel or say? Who is this woman? We don’t know her, she’s just there, and her only contribution to the story is being Neville’s mysterious ladylove, and being jealous of Anna (she doesn’t stop frowning up at her until she marries Luke). This whole subplot could have been better, because, I mean, it’s Neville, right? Anna’s best friend! He should have had a decent ending.

And finally, there’s this woman, Eliza Sharpe, translated as one of the most useless characters I’ve ever read. The moment she’s introduced, we are told the entire backstory that explains her relationship with both Anna and Neville, but this character leads, literally, nowhere. I don’t understand why we needed to read about her and get so much detail about their time in school together, for her to finally be a character who does nothing, or adds anything relevant to the story. I think about her and I can’t possibly understand why Elizabeth Camden wrote her in the first place.

So, finally, I don’t understand the glowing five stars reviews about this book. It’s not that big of a deal. Or at least, for me. The location is beautiful, and the character are deep, I can affirm that, without a doubt. But I just couldn’t care for the whole plot as I was expecting too. I will, however, read more by Elizabeth Camden, and I hope it gets better.


Sunday, April 29, 2018

Review - The Savior's Champion [spoilery]

Original Title: The Savior's Champion
Series: The Savior, #1
Author: Jenna Moreci
Published: April 24th, 2018

Publisher: Jenna Moreci
*THE FOLLOWING REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS*
In case the warning wasn’t enough, this will contain HUGE SPOILERS, and will be a million year-long. For a shorter, spoiler free review, click here.

Upon reading The Savior’s Champion, I confirmed that, definitely, gore isn’t my thing. If you have followed me for a while, you know it from the books I normally read and review. But the fact that I’m not comfortable with it, doesn’t mean that it makes up for a bad book. It’s not bad. Jenna is a good writer. My two stars rating just goes according to the level in which I enjoyed it, and some aspects I don’t entirely agree with.

Just as in her first book, Jenna proves that her strong point is dialogue, and a particularly good thing is that the Sovereign’s Tournament is explained through it, instead of prose, but again, exactly as it is in Eve, Jenna throws every single piece of information we need to understand the Savior and Her nature right from the get-go, which, in my opinion, isn’t the best way to go, because so much information in one single moment can contribute to the readers’ forgetting about it as they read the rest of the book. On the other hand, the whole plot revolves around a labyrinth… that’s it’s not really a labyrinth. It’s a long, dark tunnel filled with traps, where everyone will probably die. I mean, it is said that, in the past, it used to be a labyrinth, hence the name. But in the time the story takes place, it’s not anymore, even when the book cover itself mentions it. And it also confuses me when they say that the tournament is for the masses, in the best bread and circuses way, but, actually, people can’t see it, except for one or two challenges, because the whole thing takes place both inside the tunnel, and in Thessen’s royal palace. There’s only this guy, Wembleton, that proclaims the names of the fallen for the people to hear and cheer, but in general terms, there’s no connection between them, and the competitors.

Another thing that confuses me in this story are the names. On the one hand, the four realms are named Thessen, Kovahr, Ethyua and Trogolia, which are completely made up words. But at the same time, characters are named, for example, Tobias, Leila, Naomi and Raphael, which are names from our own dimension. It’s not the first fantasy novel in which I see this, and it completely depends on the author’s choice, but it confuses me, and makes me wonder, is this the real world or not? Also, Jenna mentions in her channel that she’s obsessed with Greek mythology, and that Thessen is very loosely based on Ancient Greece and Rome. For example, there’s a set of twins named Nyx and Hemera (two dual Greek deities, literally Night and Day), and my favorite, Orion, whose laurel is no less than the Hunter, and he’s also an archer. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not badly done, but it is kind of an obvious move in a world that it is just “very loosely” based on Ancient Greece, don’t you think?

As for the worldbuilding, it is the best example of “do what I say, but not what I do”. I get that she hates descriptions, but we deserve to know where we are standing. She explained the worldbuilding basics in two consecutive videos, and then she didn’t use more than a half of them. The result? A very un-fleshed out world filled with what appears to be a mix of perverts, warriors, whores, royals, and a very little group of decent people.

The characters are actually well built, the main ones are deep, and can pass for real people. Tobias Kaya is a good man, he enters the tournament in despite of her mother’s fear, for the sole purpose of helping his family, especially his crippled sister Naomi, although I wish there was more deepening in that regard. He’s a person of integrity in the middle of a cruel, corrupted world, in which the Savior is their only hope. That is well done. But, again, something is amiss. In one of her vlogs, Jenna says that when Tobias enters the tournament, he does something that is the furthest thing from his personality, because he’s an artist, not a warrior. But when he actually does it, we have only known him for two chapters, and we couldn’t possibly know everything about him, we can’t be a hundredth percent sure that he would NEVER do this. For what we know, he could.

Even though I couldn’t properly connect with any of the characters, my favorite was Leila, the healer girl. I loved her personality and attitude, especially the fact that she goes to the sanctuaries to help the wounded competitors, and calls every single one of them by their proper name instead of their laurel, because she doesn’t forget that, even with the tournament’s savagery, and the way the men are treated, they are still people. I loved her because she’s not to be toyed with, to the point that she keeps a dagger under her skirt and has no qualms about killing anyone who dares to cross the line with her. She has her own personality and doesn’t let anyone rule her life. But I’m afraid that she being the true Savior didn’t get me by surprise. I knew it. I so knew it. For some reason I spent chapter after chapter thinking “I bet she’s the true Savior and not Cosima”, and I turned out to be right. I don’t have to explain to you how that felt.

Oh, the love story! I couldn’t like it as I was expecting to. From the moment Leila appears, you know she and Tobias are meant to fall in love. But, actually, the most that is between them is horniness, and lust. Love only appears by the very end of the book. They seem to only like each other physically, because, of course, Leila is insanely beautiful, and Tobias starts having erotic dreams about her, over and over again. It was hard to see love between them when there are so many sexual situations in which they just give in to their physical urges. Their relationship is pure lust, and I know that they eventually fall in love, but until then, I can’t possibly think of love as I read. I was particularly bothered by a scene in which Tobias, after some thoughts of Leila, is aroused, and has to relieve himself with filthy thoughts. I mean, that was there for the sole purpose of adding dirty content to the book, because there’s absolutely no reason for it. If you are like me, you won’t like that type of scene or situation, and mostly because there’s no point to it. I don’t get why it is necessary to even see him in such a situation. I mean, what changes in his character if you remove that from the book? Plus, if he uses Leila to relieve himself of a boner, clearly that’s not love. He just lusts after her and uses her as an object to please himself. And that’s when you lose me. Sorry.

There’s, however, some intense phrases that give the idea of love, and their best scene together is actually the breaking point, the lowest moment in which Tobias is ready to give up and loses all hope. It is actually very well written, is so emotional, there’s such raw frankness between Tobias and Leila, that you can’t help seeing the feelings between them, the pure desperation Tobias feels, and the hope Leila bestows upon him. That was the first part in which I truly saw their connection, and believed there was love there, in needing each other to go on in this soulless tournament that only led to cruelty, blood and death. Well done!

Something that I didn’t like was that the other competitors didn’t seem to have a life before the tournament, and the essence of their personalities are a filthy mind and brute force. At one point I was lost with their laurels, I didn’t know which was which. And for my next point, I’ll refer to Jenna’s 10 Worst Male Character Pet Peeves vlog, specifically, from 5:50 to 6:28. Watch it, and then continue. 


Did you? Ok. After that portion of the video, I was surprised that Jenna decided to write the competitors like that. It makes no sense. I mean, ok, they are guys, but I got exhausted and disgusted with the fact that these men couldn’t talk two words in a row without mentioning their genitals or saying a penis-related sentence. At one point I wondered, can’t they really think of something that’s not sex? I mean, of course, every author can do as they think best, but really, she made a video especially criticizing this, and then she goes and puts in her book! And it’s not one of two characters that do this, but every single one of them! If it isn’t the dialogue itself, then one of them is touching himself, or… well, you can imagine the rest. And when every conversation has to revolve around that, I feel it as an attempt to mask the incapability to write a meaningful conversation, interesting dialogue points, or worthy content in general. For me, at least, it’s not worth to read characters that think with their crotch, and the constant reference to breasts and genitals was SICKENING. Honestly, there’s no other type of comparison? I repeat, Jenna herself says she hates when that happens, so why did she write it in the first place?

Around chapter five, the competitors get to see Cosima, the Savior, who, of course, is a beautiful woman, and I quote: “The Woman had taken a seat alongside Her court, and the men’s gazes danced over Her hair, Her breasts, Her lips, Her breasts, Her eyes, Her breasts.” They literally obsess over the Savior’s breasts, as if they haven’t seen a woman before, or didn’t know that women are born with them. She’s the future Queen, they are in the tournament to marry her and be the next Sovereign of Thessen, but they think of her as they would of a whore, just a body for sex, and only because they are males. It’s frustrating how none of them has at least a little bit of honor and respect left, that would make me like them. It gets exhausting and makes me ask where the worthy content of this book really is, that this kind of sentences take so much time and space. 

Also, there’s this bath scene in Thessen’s palace, as the servants clean up the competitors, that I know it’s meant to be funny, but I just didn’t think so. There was no need to get so graphic. But men are naked in that scene, girls bathe them with their bare hands, and again, every word and dialogue, is sex-related, that’s basically all the chapter seems to be about, and it adds nothing worth reading to the general plot. If I had skipped it, nothing would have changed.

If that weren’t enough, the language! Oh, my God, there’s so much swearing, and trash talk! And the extreme, graphic violence and blood are there just for the sake of it, because most of the time, there’s pretty much no point to it. There’s a lot of challenges in the Sovereign’s Tournament, but I’ll only be referring to three of them. There’s this one in which they get attacked by a herd of fanged pigs… pointlessly. It only led to more blood and even more swearing. Besides that, it could have been removed and nothing would have changed, both in the tournament and the plot. The only challenge that truly got me at the edge of my seat was the one with the poisoned wine and the antidote; it was also a little too disgusting for the sake of it, although it was totally expected. It’s the author’s style. As for the one with the three paths, the one that was deemed as the hardest wasn’t the one taken by Tobias and his group, and we never get to know why it was, in fact, the most difficult one. They make a big deal out of it, and then we don’t even get to see why. What surprised me was that no one got killed in that challenge.

Sometimes, characters in this book overcomplicate things, when simple logic could have got them out of trouble. And I mean, the challenge around the gift for the Savior, when Tobias tries to draw a portrait of Cosima, and ends up getting Leila’s face, over and over again, because he can’t stop thinking about her. My question here is, am I really the only one who thinks a very simple solution could have saved him the trouble of his humiliation and the fight with the Giant? Buddy, just tell Cosima you would like to spend time with her working on her portrait to capture her beauty in person, or something like that, because, in case you haven’t noticed by this stage of the game, flattery can get you anywhere!

And finally, there was this line in which Tobias’s bursts out and says: 

They treat us as things […] We’re not men, we’re animals trained for entertainment. We kill one another, and they cheer. It’s savagery!

For once, I agree with Tobias, the tournament is a slaughterhouse, and the lives of those who enter it are just disposable. But upon reading this line, in chapter 18, I only could roll my eyes. Really, Tobias? You are realizing that NOW? There’s only days left for the tournament to end after a month of suffering, challenges, blood and entrails, and he only realizes this after most of the men are dead, he fought in the arena in front of a crowd, and is about to do it again? Knock, knock, is logic in there somewhere? I thought that was clear from the very start.

And finally, a word on the villains. It so obvious that they are the villains, there’s not even a surprise or a shocking reveal about them, because clearly, the bad guys are the biggest and ugliest of them all (cliché?). By the hype about Kaleo in the vlogs, I thought I would hate him, that he would be this amazing villain I would just hate on sight. But it didn’t work for me, sorry. I mean, yes, the guy is a piece of garbage, he’s evil. He pushes Milo to his death, and kills for the pleasure of it without even flinching, but I really thought he would have a bigger role in the story in general. Pity he’s dead, he would have gotten better as a villain in future books. As for the other bad guys in the tournament, as I said, men like the Dragon and the Giant don’t have much to offer besides brute force and sexual innuendos. The worst villain in this story was Brontes, hands down, but I felt he lacked depth. He’s just evil, and as the Sovereign, turns it into his most effective weapon. But that’s all there is. He’s evil for the sake of it, and his motives aren’t sufficiently clear; there wasn’t any depth in his character. I didn’t get why he had the Savior’s mother dead in the prologue, and why did he want to kill Leila. Although I think that’s material for the sequel, so I won’t delve deeper.

So, in short, this isn’t the book for me, but it doesn’t mean that it can’t be perfect for other readers. Fantasy is still one of my favorite genres, just… not like this. There’s many things that were off-putting, and overly violent and disgusting, and I felt if the author had toned down the blood and entrails, the swearing, and the sex talk, to invest that effort into deeper worldbuilding, backstories and characters (especially the villains), this could have been so much better. That the book is meant for an adult audience also means character development, and deeper situations and scenes, not just mature content. So, I’m sorry, but this book is not for me. 

Thank you for reading, I know this was insanely long, but at least I could go through all of my points. 

‘til next time!


Monday, March 19, 2018

Review - The Savior's Champion [spoiler free]

Original Title: The Savior's Champion
Series: The Savior, #1
Author: Jenna Moreci
Published: April 24th, 2018

Publisher: Jenna Moreci
I was given a free copy of this book in return for an honest review. 

Please, click on the following links to watch a book trailer, Jenna’s vlog about the novel, in which she answers without spoilers some fans questions about TSC, and my own review of her first novel, Eve: the Awakening.

- Book trailer
- Jenna's vlog on TSC
- My review on Eve

With that said, let’s go to my review. This will be spoiler free.

I gave this book two GoodReads stars.

First of all, let me clarify that this isn’t a bad book. It’s just not for me, but I deserve it, because I knew where I was getting into when I signed up for this. I applied to be an ARC reviewer because I had been thinking that it would be great for me to read something out of my literary comfort zone, which is a good thing, but this book… I think it’s not for everyone, and if you are Christian, like me, there’s many things you won’t agree with, and others that just will be off-putting, and just plain disgusting. My low GoodReads rating is because I particularly didn’t like it, but I can understand why so many people loved it, and will love it once it is published. So, if you are ok with things like constant swearing, specific sexual language and scenes, graphic violence and torture scenes, you won’t have problems with this book. 

Don’t get me wrong, though. I love Jenna, and her Youtube channel. I respect her as an author, I think she’s insanely talented and a genuinely good person, and I really liked her first novel, Eve: the Awakening, which sequel I will definitely be reading. I just don’t think her particular style in this novel is for me. I repeat, it’s not a bad book! I’m just not the target audience for it, the same way there’s millions of people who are.

Some of the things I can mention for now, without giving away any spoilers, are the very long chapters, and the heavy, strict outlining. Chapters are really long, more than once I had to take a break from reading without even finishing the chapters, because they were kind of exhausting in their length. And if you follow Jenna, you know how she outlines and applies the process to the actual writing of her books; the very strict following of a previous structure is really noticeable. If you have read my review of Eve: the Awakening, you already know what I think about it, and if you haven’t, click on the link I provided earlier, and you’ll get to it (it’s the penultimate paragraph, if you don’t want to read the whole thing).

Also, names confuse me. On the one hand, the four realms are named Thessen, Kovahr, Ethyua and Trogolia, which are completely made up names. But at the same time, characters are named, for example, Tobias, Leila, Naomi and Raphael, which are names from our own dimension. It’s not the first fantasy novel in which I see this, and it completely depends on the author’s choice, but it confuses me, and makes me wonder, is this the real world or not?

That’s all I can say without spoiling anything. I have a lot of topics to discuss about this book, but that will come after the official release, on April the 24th. I’ll write my review and keep it until then. Don’t forget to visit Jenna’s Youtube channel, and check on her writing advice. In the description box of her every vlog you can find her social media links, including Patreon, and also the stores in which you can both get Eve: the Awakening, and pre-order The Savior’s Champion in your favourite format. 

Thank you for reading, and if you are interested in an spoilery review with a deeper analysis of this book, I’ll be back with it by the last week of April, and I'll link it here so you can choose which one to read.

‘til then!